â€œDiscoveries and inventions are not terminals; they are fresh starting points from which we can climb to new knowledge.â€ - Dr. Willis R. Whitney, founder of General Electric Laboratories*
CALIFORNIA AND TEXAS - LISTEN UP! PAY ATTENTION!!!
After so many years of watching airplanes produce the lines in the sky, largely without knowing of what this Project consists or why, we have recently gained an understanding. Evidence suggests that todayâ€™s chemtrail spraying operations consist of airplanes saturating our atmosphere with nano-sized particles influenced by electromagnetic energy for the purpose of weather modification.
U.S. patent #4,686,605 â€œMethod and Apparatus for Altering a Region in the Earthâ€™s Atmosphere, Ionosphere and/or Magnetosphereâ€ shows how stratospheric and tropospheric aerosols can be manipulated using electromagnetic energy in order to modify the weather. The ground-based antennas (known as ionospheric heaters) needed to produce the appropriate electromagnetic energy exist. For a detailed discussion, please see the authorâ€™s previous article â€œSmoking Gun: The HAARP and Chemtrails Connection.â€
The 1996 U.S. military document â€œWeather as a Force Multiplier: Owning the Weather in 2025â€³ outlines a program using aerosols sprayed from airplanes which are then manipulated with electromagnetic energy in order to modify the weather. This document will be discussed shortly.
The common thread here is weather modification or, as the Library of Congress calls it, â€œweather control.â€ Lots of other evidence supporting this assertion exists as well, but these two documents are the most salient.
Motives are plenty. Most notably, significant direct benefits can be gained by playing financial markets which rise and fall with the weather such as the weather derivatives and catastrophe reinsurance markets; not to mention agricultural and energy commodities. Enron pioneered the markets. With foreknowledge of the weather, so many scams could be concocted that it boggles the mind. Weather routinely changes the course of Human history. It determines what we do every day. It determines the outcomes of wars and influences elections. Control of the weather is God-like power. Money and power junkies want it.
Controlling Earthâ€™s weather would necessarily require a gigantic scientific effort. Oddly enough, when one looks for a National effort in weather modification, one finds a lot. Specifically, if one looks, one can find a history of weather control programs involving electromagnetic energy and atmospheric particles; all in a coherent chronological order.
This paper is the result of thousands of dollars and countless hours spent researching many thousands of pages of source, organizational and Government documents related to weather modification and the atmospheric sciences. This article serves as the foundation for a series of shortly forthcoming articles detailing the history and current state of this Project.
May this work help end the spraying.
AMERICANS - TAKE NOTE HERE! A CLASS ACTION LAWSUIT AGAINST THE USA NWO / UN / NATO CORPORATION 'MILITARY' AND THE USA CRIMINAL ROGUE CORPORATION 'GOVERNMENT' - GROUNDS CONTAINED THROUGHOUT THIS POST. EVERYONE CONTRIBUTE WHAT YOU CAN - EVEN $1.00 x THOUSANDS OF CONTRIBUTIONS - NO MILLIONS - WILL GET THE JOB DONE.
For the fact that these environmental modifications have been done without our informed consent, may this work contribute to the largest class-action lawsuit in history.
This paper examines the origins and development of this; the first planetary level scientific endeavor. Now is our opportunity to gain a deeper understanding of the New Manhattan Project.
The Origins of Weather Modification
People have been attempting to modify the weather for ever. Most commonly, man has gone about making it rain; especially in times of drought. The earliest recorded efforts were those of mystics. Local shaman would be called upon to ingest a certain concoction in order to communicate with the weather gods and ask for help. In some cases, the sacrifice of certain animals in certain fashions may have been the thing to do. Sometimes a good old rain dance may have done the trick.
Some early Western efforts to stop destructive weather are outlined in professor James Flemingâ€™s book Fixing the Sky. On page 78 he writes, â€œIn ancient Greece, the official â€˜hail wardensâ€™ of Cleonae were appointed at public expense to watch for hail and then signal the farmers to offer blood sacrifices to protect their fields: a lamb, a chicken, or even a poor man drawing blood from his finger was deemed sufficient.â€
A little later professor Fleming writes, â€œIn Austria, it was traditional to ring â€˜thunder bellsâ€™ or blow on huge â€˜weather hornsâ€™ while herdsmen set up a terrific howl and women rattled chains and beat milk pails to scare away the destructive spirit of the storm.â€
Much of the early Western attempts at weather modification involved the detonation of explosive charges in the lower atmosphere. It was hypothesized that atmospheric explosions cause precipitation.
Early American Involvement
Although there has been much international participation, this article focuses on Americaâ€™s participation in the New Manhattan Project. Throughout the development of the New Manhattan Project, America was the worldâ€™s technological leader; especially in the area of military technology. America led the way and developed most of this Project. America continues to lead the Project today. Therefore the early history of weather modification in America is relevant.
James Pollard Espy (1785-1860) also known as â€œThe Storm Kingâ€ was the first meteorologist in U.S. government service. Although he never received Federal funding for it, he suggested that forest fires can produce rainfall and that experiments in this area should be carried out. His magnum opus was a book called The Philosophy of Storms. This book contains a long section entitled â€œArtificial Rains.â€
The first Federally funded weather modification field effort took place in Texas in 1891, with funds appropriated by the Congress in the amount of nine thousand dollars through the Department of Agriculture. The experiment involved weather modifier Robert St. George Dyrenforth (1844-1910) attacking the atmosphere with balloons, kites, dynamite, mortars, smoke bombs and fireworks. The results were inconclusive, but you can bet that the atmosphere was absolutely terrified!
From these early efforts until the beginning of the scientific era in 1946, the realm of weather modification was inhabited largely by a motley collection of pseudo-scientists and con artists similar to Dyrenforth. These people, who referred to themselves as â€œrainmakers,â€ traveled around the Country (mostly the West), going where local governments were willing to pay for their services. If a certain region was experiencing a severe drought, people were often desperate for solutions. These rainmakersâ€™ activities often involved the mixing and open air release of dangerous chemicals. Some of these efforts were Federally funded. Since the days of Robert Dyrenforth, the Federal money has not stopped flowing.
Nikola Tesla (murdered by 'gov' orders, and documentation of experiments and inventions stolen by the 'gov'))
In the late 1800s, inventor Nikola Tesla (1856-1943) popularized the use of electromagnetic energy. In his 1905 United States patent number 787,412 â€œArt of Transmitting Electrical Energy Through the Natural Mediumsâ€ Tesla describes how electromagnetic energy may be sent and received through the atmosphere. The Supreme Court found that U.S. patent #645,576 â€œSystem of Transmission of Electrical Energyâ€ proves he invented radio; not Marconi. He pioneered radar. He invented wireless signal and power transmission. Yes, power can be transmitted wirelessly; weâ€™ll have more about that later.
Teslaâ€™s musings and scientific discoveries pioneered what are todayâ€™s ionospheric heaters which use electromagnetic energy to cause atmospheric perturbations from great distances and play a defining role in the New Manhattan Project. Specifically, he pioneered the use of a certain type of electromagnetic energy called extremely-low frequency (ELF). This is a specific type of energy known to be used in the New Manhattan Project; the other being very-low frequency (VLF) electromagnetic energy.
In her book Tesla: Man Out of Time, Margaret Cheney writes that he did a good deal of theorizing about weather control. She also writes that he theorized that the entire earth might be illuminated by shooting electromagnetic energy 35,000 feet up into the atmosphere. 35,000 feet is about the altitude of todayâ€™s offending airplanes.
The Beginning of the Scientific Era
The scientific era of weather modification began famously in 1946 with a trio of scientists from General Electric Laboratories: Irving Langmuir, Vincent Schaefer and Bernard Vonnegut. Leading the group was the world famous Nobel Peace Prize winning scientist Irving Langmuir (1881-1957). This trio popularized the fact that, under certain circumstances, dumping substances from airplanes into clouds causes precipitation. Early experiments used dry ice while later experiments pioneered the use of silver iodide. Also invented were silver iodide generation equipment and many other weather related scientific instruments. Much of this trioâ€™s work here was done in cooperation with the Office of Naval Research and the Air Force. Although others had previously dumped stuff out of airplanes in attempts to modify the weather, the G.E. scientists practiced a sound scientific method previously unseen in the field.
Schaefer, Langmuir & Vonnegut, image source: General Electric Laboratories
Following the famous scientific weather modification efforts of the G.E. Labs trio, the publicâ€™s imagination was sparked and a government regulated weather modification industry flourished. To this day, the government-regulated weather modification industry (or â€œconventionalâ€ weather modification industry as we will call it) expels dry ice, lead iodide or silver iodide (usually silver iodide) from airplanes.
However, the conventional weather modification industry is distinct from the New Manhattan Project and therefore is not the focus of this article. The New Manhattan Project employs electromagnetic energy to manipulate dispersed particles while conventional weather modifiers do not. Also, conventional weather modification efforts are conducted on a regional basis while the New Manhattan Project is global. (What they DON'T reveal is all the OTHER ingredients in their 'formulas' and what these are designed to do - against humans, crops, water, etc.)
Not long after the scientific breakthroughs of the G.E. Labs trio, fueled by high level political rhetoric and popular interest, the United States federal government began pouring hundreds of millions of dollars annually into basic atmospheric research. Since then, the United States government is admitted to have spent many tens of billions of dollars on weather modification and the atmospheric sciences. Much of that was expended in 1950s, â€™60s and â€™70s dollars. If one is to control the weather, one must know how the atmosphere works. Or as geoengineer Dr. Clement J. Todd wrote in 1970, â€œOur ability to manage precipitation depends upon four factors: (1) understanding the physical processes of the atmosphere, (2) real-time knowledge of the weather we wish to manipulate, (3) devising the optimum treatment material and technique, and (4) delivery of that treatment to the cloud where and when we wish.â€
The majority of the vast expanses of literature pertaining to weather modification and the atmospheric sciences is geared towards conventional weather modification. However, both the New Manhattan Project and conventional weather modification are supported by basic atmospheric research. So, buried in this body of literature, one may find glimpses of the New Manhattan Project. The rest of this paper recounts these glimpses.
One member of the G.E. Labs trio, Bernard Vonnegut (1914-1997) went on to pioneer weather modification research involving the use of artificial electric charges and atmospheric aerosols. His work in this area was performed under Government contracts outsourced to a research and development firm called Arthur D. Little Inc.
Bernard Vonnegut, image source: Life Magazine
The earliest recorded instances of electricity being intentionally used to modify particles in the atmosphere can be found in the 1884 experiments of Sir Oliver Lodge (1851-1940). The 1918 U.S. patent #1,279,823 â€œProcess and Apparatus for Causing Precipitation by Coalescence of Aqueous Particles Contained in the Atmosphereâ€ by J.G. Balsillie built upon Lodgeâ€™s work. Using this knowledge as a basis, Mr. Vonnegut resumed Lodgeâ€™s work; this time with massive funding and modernized scientific equipment.
Beginning in 1953, Bernard Vonnegut, Arthur D. Little et al., conducted experiments involving stainless steel wires miles long strung from the tops of telephone poles, connected to a power supply and discharging corona. The coronal dischargeâ€™s effect upon ambient aerosols and the clouds above was monitored and analyzed. Through 1961, these experiments were carried out in Massachusetts, New Hampshire, Texas, Illinois and New Mexico. These types of experiments are referred to as â€œspace chargeâ€ experiments. The U.S. Signal Corps and the U. S. Coast Guard provided support. Others performed similar experiments.
Space charge experiment, image source: The Massachusetts Institute of Technology
The 1958 â€œFinal Report of the Advisory Committee on Weather Controlâ€ contained an article by Bernard Vonnegut, Vincent Schaefer, J. S. Barrows and Paul MacCready titled â€œThe Future.â€ In it they outline an atmosphere saturated with â€œchemicalsâ€ and â€œalteringâ€ atmospheric electrical variables. It reads:
When the nature of thunderstorm electrification is understood it may prove possible to control this process by the introduction of chemicals into the atmosphere or by altering electrical variables. Such variables might be atmospheric conductivity, field, and space charge, or perhaps the corona giving properties of the earthâ€™s surface. When we become sufficiently sophisticated concerning the dynamics of the atmosphere it is possible that weather may be controlled by the large scale release of chemical or more probably thermonuclear heat energy.
In 1961, Bernard Vonnegut, Arnold W. Doyle and D. Read Moffett wrote a paper for Arthur D. Little titled â€œResearch in Electrical Phenomena Associated with Aerosols.â€ This was a report about their experiments of the previous 3 months involving the effects of electromagnetic energy upon a grounded sphere in a small chamber surrounded by gas. Please consider the implications of that. We will revisit this paper much later.
If you are wonderingâ€¦ yes, Bernard Vonnegut was related to the novelist Kurt Vonnegut. They were brothers.
In 1958 the chief White House advisor on weather modification, Captain Howard T. Orville, said the U.S. defense department was studying â€œways to manipulate the charges of the earth and sky and so affect the weatherâ€ by using an electronic beam to ionize or de-ionize the atmosphere over a given area.
The Department of Commerce Weather Bureau reported in 1960 that they were conducting a weather modification study in which, â€œChemicals are introduced into the cloud which noticeably changes the surface tension of the droplets. Electrification effects are being observed by artificially electrifying the droplets and subjecting them to impressed electric fields.â€
For better or for worse, this super secret program had a prophet. His name was United States Navy Admiral William Francis Raborn (1905-1990).
William Francis Raborn, image source: United States Navy
In the January 1963 edition of the U.S. Naval Institute Proceedings, Admiral Raborn outlined a program using electromagnetic energy to modify the weather. His article was entitled â€œNew Horizons of Naval Research and Development.â€ In this paper, underneath the heading of â€˜Environmental Warfareâ€™ he wrote:
The possibilities for the military employment of the â€œweather weaponâ€ may be as diverse as they are numerous. An ability to control the weather could introduce greater changes in warfare than those which occurred in 1945 with the explosion of the first nuclear weapons.
A severe storm or hurricane striking a naval force may well inflict greater damage than could an enemy. The capability to change the direction of destructive storms and guide them toward enemy concentrations may exist in the future arsenal of the naval tactical commander.
Ground, sea, air and amphibious operations might be supported by the dissipation of fog or clouds, or by the production of rain or drought. Conversely, the creation of solid, low overcasts might be used to conceal troop concentrations, movements, and task force deployments. Large-scale weather control techniques might be used to cause extensive flooding in strategic areas or even to bring a new â€œice ageâ€ upon the enemy. By influencing the ionosphere and atmosphere simultaneously, magnetic, acoustic, and pressure effects might be generated in such a way that ocean-wide sweeping of mines would occur.
Creating or dissipating atmospheric
temperature/humidity ducts might modify the refractive index of the atmosphere enough to influence radar or radio transmission. Artificially-induced ionospheric storms might produce a blackout of communications.
Certain electromagnetic waves are unable to pass through an area of precipitation. A cloud seeding generator could be employed under appropriate meteorological conditions to produce precipitation that would interfere with the operation of radio-guided or remotely-controlled devices or vehicles. We already have taken our first steps toward developing an environmental warfare capability. We are using satellite weather data from Tiros II for current, tactical operations and more accurate, long-range weather predictions. Some experiments in fog dissipation have shown promise, and some exploratory research has been conducted on ways to change the heading of major storms.
For these reasons â€“ and because our advances in science make it reasonable â€“ we are now engaged in planning a ten-year, comprehensive study of the atmosphere, a study which we will designate ATMOS. This plan will be co-ordinated with our TENOC oceanographic studies.
About the ATMOS program, the author has failed to find any other significant information. The author has looked over a 1961 report pertaining to the Navy TENOC (Ten Year Program in Oceanography) program. Although it did not contain any specific information pertinent to the New Manhattan Project, it did make mention of another, classified TENOC report.
It is notable that the title of Rabornâ€™s article includes the word â€œhorizonâ€ because the type of electromagnetic energy to which he refers is akin to â€œover the horizon radar.â€ This type of radar is called â€œover the horizonâ€ because it is bounced off the ionosphere and therefore is effective far beyond the range of the forty miles or so (depending on terrain) afforded by previous radar systems. Forty miles is approximately the distance one can see over flat land or sea before the curvature of the Earth obscures points beyond. Over the horizon radar, on the other hand, is effective to thousands of miles. Todayâ€™s ionospheric heaters evolved as over the horizon radar.
Also of note is the fact that the United States Navy, of which Mr. Raborn was an admiral, is today one of the managers of the HAARP facility in Alaska. The HAARP facility contains the worldâ€™s most powerful ionospheric heater which is documented to be able to modify the weather.
In the 1967 National Science Foundationâ€™s ninth annual weather modification report, it reads, â€œESSA [Environmental Science Services Administration] is also investigating the effect of cirrus clouds on the radiation budget of the atmosphere by studying aircraft-produced contrails which often spread into cirrus layers covering considerable fractions of the sky. One technique proposed for modifying lower cloud development has been the generation of a high level cirrus deck with jet aircraft. By intercepting solar radiation at high altitude it may be possible to influence larger scale cloud development elsewhere by reducing solar input and reducing convective cloud generation in areas where they are not needed.â€ This is essentially todayâ€™s geoengineering thesis.
A little later in that same report, it reads that their computer atmospheric simulations, or â€˜modelsâ€™ as they call them, might simulate, â€œâ€¦producing high-level cirrus cloud cover over an area by means of jet aircraft, inserting particulate matter into the upper atmosphere to alter the solar radiation balance and the like.â€
In 1966, the Interdepartmental Committee on Atmospheric Sciences Select Panel on Weather Modification produced a document titled â€œPresent and Future Plans of Federal Agencies in Weather-Climate Modification.â€ On page 17 of this report, it reads, â€œIt is anticipated that there will be a few large-scale facilities funded for the testing of modification schemes. Typical schemes might be the suspension of a spray nozzle over a valley between two mountain peaks to produce cloud-sized droplets into which electrical charges can be introduced in either polarity, contaminants can be introduced, and the drop size spectrum can be adjusted to any reasonable distribution.â€ The Interdepartmental Committee on Atmospheric Sciences subsequently agreed to proceed with the development of a National Weather Modification Program along the lines of this report.
The now defunct Interdepartmental Committee for Atmospheric Sciences (ICAS) was created by the Federal Council for Science and Technology in 1959 in order to oversee and coordinate a wide range of basic atmospheric research originating from many previously disparate government offices. Their focus was weather modification. Members of the ICAS included the departments of Agriculture, Commerce, Defense, Interior, Transportation and State as well as the Environmental Protection Agency, the Energy Research and Development Administration, the National Aeronautics and Space Administration and the National Science Foundation. These are the government agencies which have been involved in weather modification all along.
The ICAS produced a series of semi-annual reports between 1960 and 1978. In these reports, ICAS member organizationsâ€™ weather related scientific activities and expenditures were recounted. The ICAS reportsâ€™ areas of study included: Earthâ€™s natural geomagnetic energy, different ways clouds form and different ways they precipitate, lightning, hurricanes and other extreme weather, inadvertent weather modification, intentional weather modification and extra-planetary atmospheres. The ICAS is duly noted here because so much of the history of the New Manhattan Project is accounted for in the pages of their reports.
In the 1969 ICAS report, under the heading of â€œCloud Electricity Modification,â€ it is written that the National Science Foundation is developing, â€œMeans for injecting significant quantities of charge artificially into cloudsâ€¦â€
Again in this 1969 report, on page 37 it describes the Armyâ€™s intentions in the area of weather modification. It reads, â€œStudies will continue on upper atmospheric structure and dynamics, lasers and other electromagnetic propagation, and acoustic propagation. New approaches to atmospheric modification will be studied.â€
On page 42 of the 1971 ICAS special report â€œA National Program for Accelerating Progress in Weather Modification,â€ the authors write of fog being cleared by airplanes releasing chemicals and â€˜electrical methodsâ€™ of fog dissipation.
On page 79 of the 1973 ICAS report, it is written, â€œThere is a great deal to be learned before we can with confidence say what effect can be produced by the injection of chemically active trace gasses and particulates into the lower stratosphere. New emphasis has been given to both dynamical and physical meteorological research relevant to this question.â€
United States patent #5,003,186 â€œStratospheric Welsbach Seeding for Reduction of Global Warmingâ€ was filed by the Hughes Aircraft Corporation in 1991. The patent describes a method for dispersing particulates into the upper atmosphere in order to save us from global warming. The author David B. Chang suggests that aluminum oxide be used for this purpose. Lab tests from around the world have shown aluminum to be the number one chemtrail ingredient.â€
One proposed solution to the problem of global warming,â€ it reads, â€œinvolves the seeding of the atmosphere with metallic particles. One technique proposed to seed the metallic particles was to add the tiny particles to the fuel of jet airliners, so that the particles would be emitted from the jet engine exhaust while the airliner was at its cruising altitude.
â€œThe first mention of aluminum occurs in this passage, â€œThe method comprises the step of seeding the greenhouse gas layer with a quantity of tiny particles of materials characterized by wavelength-dependent emissivity or reflectivity, in that said materials have high emissivities in the visible and far infrared wavelength region. Such materials can include the class of materials known as Welsbach materials. The oxides of metal, e.g., aluminum oxide, are also suitable for the purpose.â€ The second mention of aluminum occurs a little later. It reads, â€œAnother class of materials having the desired property includes the oxides of metals. For example, aluminum oxide (Al2O3) is one metal oxide suitable for the purpose and which is relatively inexpensive.â€
The Hughes Aircraft Corporation was acquired by and is now integrated into Raytheon.
A 1994 document produced by Stanford Research International called â€œMultiple Instrument Studies of Chemical Releases and Heating at Areciboâ€ details three barium releases of 48 kilograms each over Puerto Rico. The barium clouds produced by these rocket-borne explosions were subsequently hit with man-made electromagnetic energy from an ionospheric heater and thus turned into a plasma. Barium has been found to be the number two chemtrail ingredient.
In 1996 the Air Force produced a previously mentioned document called â€œWeather as a Force Multiplier: Owning the Weather in 2025.â€ The document was produced by the Department of Defense and written as ordered by the chief of staff of the Air Force, Ronald R. Fogleman. â€œOwning the Weatherâ€ was but one in a series of 39 documents speaking to a great overhaul of Air Force operations to be achieved by the year 2025. The larger set of documents is called â€œAir Force 2025.â€ â€œOwning the Weatherâ€ describes a system of weather modification combining atmospheric aerosols with electromagnetic energy.
On page 2 the document reads, â€œPrior to the attack, which is coordinated with forecasted weather conditions, the UAVs begin cloud generation and seeding operations. UAVs [unmanned aerial vehicles] disperse a cirrus shield to deny enemy visual and infrared (IR) surveillance. Simultaneously, microwave heaters create localized scintillation to disrupt active sensing via synthetic aperture radar (SAR) systems such as the commercially available Canadian search and rescue satellite-aided tracking (SARSAT) that will be widely available in 2025. Other cloud seeding operations cause a developing thunderstorm to intensify over the target, severely limiting the enemyâ€™s capability to defend. The WFSE monitors the entire operation in real-time and notes the successful completion of another very important but routine weather-modification mission.â€
The document mostly speaks to military combat applications, but there are some very interesting quotes. Hereâ€™s one, â€œIn the United States, weather-modification will likely become a part of national security policy with both domestic and international applications.â€ Letâ€™s hear more about those â€œdomestic applicationsâ€
On page 34 the document reads, â€œThe ability to modify the weather may be desirable both for economic and defense reasons.â€
Also in 1996, as part of the same series containing â€œOwning the Weather,â€ the Air Force produced a document entitled â€œAn Operational Analysis for Air Force 2025â€³ which briefly outlines something they call a â€œweather analysis and modification system.â€ This system is described as employing both particulate seeding and microwave energy for the purpose of weather modification.
Under the heading of â€œWeather Analysis and Modification System,â€ the document reads, â€œA global network of sensors provides â€˜weather warriorsâ€™ with the means to monitor and accurately predict weather activities and their effects on military operations. A diverse set of weather modification tools allows manipulation of small-to-medium scale weather phenomena to enhance friendly force capabilities and degrade those of the adversary.â€
In the mid-nineties, Lawrence Livermore Laboratories scientists Edward Teller, Lowell Wood and Roderick Hyde wrote a series of papers calling for the spraying of megatons of aluminum to save us from global warming. The mid-nineties was when reports of chemtrail spraying in American skies began pouring in. If you will recall, aluminum has been found to be the number one chemtrail ingredient.
In their 1997 paper â€œGlobal Warming and Ice Ages,â€ the Livermore Labs trio wrote, â€œIt has been suggested that alumina injected into the stratosphere by the exhaust of solid-rocket motors might scatter non-negligible amounts of sunlight. We expect that introduction of scattering-optimized alumina particles into the stratosphere may well be overall competitive with use of sulfur oxides; alumina particles offer a distinctly different environmental impact profile.â€
They continue to espouse the virtues of stratospheric alumina in the footnotes writing, â€œAlumina, like sulfate, is ubiquitous in the terrestrial biosphere, and its stratospheric injection seemingly poses no significant environment issues.â€
So there you have an evolutionary history of a project employing sprayed particles and the electrification of clouds for the purpose of weather modification. Is this a coincidence? Are all these examples simply isolated, one-off events not a part of a larger overall plan? What are the odds of these data points evolving in a chronological order such as they have without being part of a coordinated effort? One may be looking at something like a quadrillion to one; and that is conservative.
For five days only, from Thursday, February 19 through Monday, February 23, my ebook Chemtrails Exposed will be available for free from Amazon.
Stay tuned. God willing, this article is only the first of many coming in this year; 2015. The heavy lifting (studying the history of weather modification) is complete. The next papers will come much easier because they involve smaller topics and half or more of the work on each is already done. Although the topic will remain secret until publication, you can expect the next article in a couple of months, possibly sooner. Until then, keep firing in the information war. Thank you.
Peter A. Kirby is a San Rafael, CA author and activist. Check out the newly updated and expanded edition of his ebook Chemtrails Exposed. Itâ€™s still only 99Â¢, but not for long.
Adventure into the Unknown: the first 50 years of the General Electric Research Laboratory by Laurence A. Hawkins, published by William Morrow & Company, 1950
U.S. patent #4,686,605 â€œMethod and Apparatus for Altering a Region in the Earthâ€™s Atmosphere, Ionosphere and/or Magnetosphere,â€ 1987
â€œWeather as a Force Multiplier: Owning the Weather in 2025â€³ by Col. Tamzy J. House, Lt. Col. James B. Near, Jr., LTC William B. Shields (USA), Maj. Ronald J. Celentano, Maj. David M. Husband, Maj. Ann E. Mercer and Maj. James E. Pugh, published by the United States Air Force, 1996 The Smartest Guys in the Room by Bethany McLean and Peter Elkind, published by the Penguin Group, 2004
The Weather Changers by D.S. Halacy, Jr., published by Harper and Row, 1968
Fixing the Sky by James Roger Fleming, published by Columbia University Press, 2010
U.S. patent #787,412 â€œArt of Transmitting Electrical Energy Through the Natural Mediums,â€ 1905
U.S. patent #645,576 â€œSystem of Transmission of Electrical Energy,â€ 1900
Tesla: Man Out of Time by Margaret Cheney, published by Simon & Schuster, 1981
Early History of Cloud Seeding by Barrington S. Havens, published by the Langmuir Laboratory at the New Mexico Institute of Mining and Technology, the Atmospheric Sciences Research Center at the State University of New York at Albany and the Research and Development Center of the General Electric Company, 1978
Interdepartmental Committee for Atmospheric Sciences reports 1960-1978, published by the Federal Council for Science and Technology
â€œDepartment of the Interior Program in Precipitation Management for 1970â€³ by Dr. Clement J. Todd as it appeared in the â€œProceedings of the Twelfth Interagency Conference on Weather Modificationâ€ 1970 U.S. patent #1,279,823 â€œProcess and Apparatus for Causing Precipitation by Coalescence of Aqueous Particles Contained in the Atmosphereâ€
â€œTechnique for Introducing Low-Density Space Charge into the Atmosphereâ€ by B. Vonnegut, K. Maynard, W.G. Sykes and C.B. Moore, published by Arthur D. Little and the Journal of Geophysical Research, volume 66, number 3, March, 1961 â€œThe Futureâ€ by Bernard Vonnegut, Vincent Schaefer, J. S. Barrows and Paul MacCready, published in the Final Report of the Advisory Committee on Weather Control, p201, 1958 Research in Electrical Phenomena Associated with Aerosols by Bernard Vonnegut, Arnold W. Doyle and D. Read Moffett, published by Arthur D. Little, 1961
Angels Donâ€™t Play this HAARP: advances in Tesla technology by Jeane Manning and Dr. Nick Begich, published by Earthpulse Press, p78, 1995
1st National Science Foundation annual weather modification report, p14, 1960
â€œNew Horizons of Naval Research and Developmentâ€ by William Francis Raborn, published in U.S.Naval Institute Proceedings, January, 1963 â€œTen Year Program in Oceanography: TENOCâ€ by the U.S. Navy, March 13, 1961 9th National Science Foundation annual weather modification report, 1967
â€œPresent and Future Plans of Federal Agencies in Weather-Climate Modificationâ€ by the Interdepartmental Committee on Atmospheric Sciences Select Panel on Weather Modification, 1966 Interdepartmental Committee on Atmospheric Sciences memorandum to Homer E. Newell dated June 21, 1966, as it appeared in the appendix to â€œPresent and Future Plans of Federal Agencies in Weather-Climate Modificationâ€ by the Interdepartmental Committee on Atmospheric Sciences Select Panel on Weather Modification, 1966
â€œThe Interdepartmental Committee on Atmospheric Sciences: A Case Historyâ€ by Robert E. Morrison U.S. patent #5,003,186 â€œStratospheric Welsbach Seeding for Reduction of Global Warming,â€ 1991
â€œMultiple Instrument Studies of Chemical Releases and Heating at Areciboâ€ by Stanford Research International, published by Stanford Research International, 1994 â€œAir Force 2025â€³ by the U.S. Air Force, published by the U.S. Air Force, 1996 â€œAn Operational Analysis for Air Force 2025â€³ by the U.S. Air Force, published by the U.S. Air Force as part of â€œAir Force 2025â€³ by the U.S. Air Force, published by the U.S. Air Force, 1996 Global Warming and Ice Ages by Edward Teller, Lowell Wood and Roderick Hyde, published by the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, 1997