From the beginning of time, from the Vatican, The Roman Court presents*:
COURTS OF DUE PROCESS
of Trickery, Lies and Deceit... for Profit!
Youâ€™ve heard it? Years ago, that the USA is under Roman Civil Law! Right? But what did that mean back then? Who knew? Well obviously higher-ups in our government and so-called religious leaders, if that, knew and again failed to give full disclosure. So sometime after the Pilgrims landed, the 13 British Colonies were formed and incorporated, after the first shot was heard around the World, after the Liberty Bell was cast, cracked and rung, after the land West of the Mississippi was opened for claiming and the West was being settled, and during the industrial revolution, the Roman Civil Courts and their â€˜private process for profitâ€™ was being developed and perfected for implementation upon America and the unsuspecting people. Even unto this day, for control and profit for the â€˜filthy lucreâ€™ extracted from the people under trickery, lies and deceit (fraud)â€¦ called court fines and judgments, called â€œDue Processâ€, of taking the wealth of the individual man and/or forcing him into subjugation as a debtor/slave thrown into the stocks or prison. This is greater than â€˜Constitutional impermissible application of statuteâ€™; itâ€™s Fraud, its Treason beyond comprehension!
The following is â€˜FULL DISCLOSUREâ€™, to some shocking and undisclosed assumptions that are considered fraud under what you would think would be necessary prudent disclosure by our (?) judicial branch of government. At the end of some paragraphs is the Vatican Canon cited within their Roman Civil Law private commercial scheme/program. Comments by the Editor are in Brackets [ ].
It is suggested that you read this article 5 times or more to fully grasp and understand the severity and depth of the scheme you have been subjected to from the time you stepped into the adult world of trickery, lies and deceit, in the state of confusion, where you were summoned, cited or ordered to come to â€˜Courtâ€™. The Public Fool System taught you in Political Science, of our American System of Justice, of its part and parcel of â€œDue Process of Lawâ€ in our legal system because of what our Fore-fathers created, for our security and Freedom, and of the American flag that flies outside the courthouse, never mind the admiralty flag (Gold fringe) that is displayed inside the courtroom. But, hereâ€™s the other side of the story, the coin or whatâ€™s up the Black Dress of the Judge. (Black is evil â€“ White is pure, is there something to that?)
There is no â€˜Statutes of Limitationâ€™ for FRAUD! For lack of full disclosure of the above, you were defrauded! What did you lose from going to court? How much did you have to pay? How much time did you spend in Jail or prison? Monetary damages are set at $1.8 Million dollars a day for each day of unlawful incarceration aloneâ€¦ based on fraud, you bet! (TREZEVANT V. CITY OF TAMPA, 741 F.2nd 336 (1984) - Evidence was sufficient to support verdict of award of $25,000.00 for 23 minutes of unlawful incarceration. (in a 24 hour time period at $25,000 for every 30 min = $1,800,000.00)
READ ONâ€¦ as the Good Book says: â€œMy people are destroyed for lack of knowledge.â€ That might be true, but who had the duty and responsibility to give you you/us full disclosureâ€¦ your pastor, Bishop or Popeâ€¦ or the people you elected into so-called public officeâ€¦ who has supported this fraud since day one of operation of the trickery, lies and deceit. A day of reckoning is coming, whether by â€œcoming out of herâ€ as described in the Good Book or by your Tort Action or otherwiseâ€¦ read on and open thy eyes to reality.
â”€ Robert Kelly â€“ Editor.
Emphasis added by bolding and underlining!
A Roman Court is a Forum for the exclusive private business of a Law (Bar) Guild sanctioned by the Roman Cult, also known as the Vatican, in which members of the guild presume certain roles on behalf of the "government" in order to make profit (unjust enrichment by all standards that we have learned) for the guild and its members through direct asset seizure and the commercialization of various securities, bonds and bailments. Canon 3224
The meaning and source of the word "court" in respect of Roman Court is derived from the Latin word cautio meaning "securities, bond and bailment" as the primary commercial business of ancient Roman Cult sanctioned law guilds since the 13th Century. Canon 3225
Prior to the creation of the Bar Associations in the 19th Century, the private Bar Guilds were known as "guilds" as well as "livery" companies and often by the name as Judges and Notaries since the 13th Century coinciding with the invention of Indulgences of the Roman Cult. Canon 3226
A Private Bar Guild, also known as a â€œBar Associationâ€ and a â€œBar Societyâ€ is a constituted elitist secret society and commercial guild franchise dedicated to commercializing, profiting and corrupting the laws of a particular broader community for the benefit of its own members. Private Bar Guilds or â€œBar Associationsâ€ are the very worst secret societies to ever exist in the history of civilization.
Private Bar Guilds were originally constituted as commercial guilds of judges and notaries in the late 12th Century in Venice, Genoa and Florence. In their first form, the Private Guild would offer its services to resolve disputes for a fee called â€œguiltâ€ being an ancient word for gold. Hence, the forum for the conduct of Private Bar Guild business was called a â€œcourtâ€ after the Latin cautio meaning â€œ(commercialization of) bonds, bailments and securitiesâ€. Canon 3420 [ See , justice was never free! So the statue of â€˜Justiceâ€™, where she holds the scales of justice and a swordâ€¦ and is blindfolded, maybe the blindfold was forced upon her, or represents that the people have been blinded from seeing the true scam here! ]
As the Private Bar Guilds are wholly dedicated to the corruption and manipulation of the law for organized criminal activity, all such societies, associationsâ€™ by any name or form a reprobate, forbidden and not permitted to be revived. In their place, a series of Colleges shall be formed dedicated to the ideals of restoring the law including but not limited to the College of Judges and the College of Clerks in accordance with the most sacred covenant Pactum de Singularis Caelum. Canon 3421
However, the Private Bar Guilds/Bar Associations/attorneys by and through the take over the modern universities, law schools and colleges, teach only Civil Law (statute law)â€¦ while they mention common law, but only teach Civil Law. All codified law has its roots in Canon Law (Civil, Statute Code, etc.) [ See the problem? It is the program/scheme to funnel the lemmings into this particular form law for the unjust enrichment of Guilds, Courts as private corporate businesses but theyâ€™re not going to tell you how youâ€™re being raped, pillaged or plundered. That would cut into their profits! ]
In order to make â€œguildâ€ money, called â€œGuiltâ€ or â€œGuiltyâ€, the Private Bar Guilds normally oversee a unique hidden (constructive) trust for each controversy or â€œsuitâ€ that comes into the private Roman Court. Any bonds that are generated, called â€œGuilt bondsâ€ are connected to the hidden trust, which the private Bar Guild members are sworn to deny exists. Canon 3227
A Roman Court does not operate according to any true rule of law (even though they are not disclosed), but by presumptions of the law. Therefore, if presumptions presented by the private Bar
Guild are not rebutted they become fact and are therefore said to stand true. There are twelve (12) key presumptions asserted by the private Bar Guilds which if unchallenged stand true being Public Record, Public Service, Public Oath, Immunity, Summons, Custody, Court of Guardians, Court of Trustees, Government as Executor/Beneficiary, Agent and Agency, Incompetence, and Guilt: Canon 3228 [ Judicial Colleges teach judges to: â€˜hear the case, apply the evidence and rule anyway you (the judge) wantsâ€™! ]
(i) The Presumption of Public Record is that any matter brought before a lower Roman Court is a matter for the public record when in fact it is presumed by the members of the private Bar Guild that the matter is a private Bar Guild business matter. Unless openly rebuked and rejected by stating clearly the matter is to be on the Public Record, the matter remains a private Bar Guild matter completely under private Bar Guild rules; and
(ii) The Presumption of Public Service is that all the members of the Private Bar Guild who have all sworn a solemn secret absolute oath to their Guild then act as public agents of the Government, or â€œpublic officialsâ€ by making additional oaths of public office that openly and deliberately contradict their private "superior" oaths to their own Guild. Unless openly rebuked and rejected, the claim stands that these private Bar Guild members are legitimate public servants and therefore trustees under public oath; and [Some or most all attorneys, prosecutors and judges have taken the Freemason oath and/or the Kol Nidre Oath which overrides their â€˜public oathâ€™]
(iii) The Presumption of Public Oath is that all members of the Private Bar Guild acting in the capacity of "public officials" who have sworn a solemn public oath remain bound by that oath and therefore bound to serve honestly, with impartiality and fairly as dictated by their oath. Unless openly challenged and demanded, the presumption stands that the Private Bar Guild members have functioned under their public oath in contradiction to their Guild oath. If challenged, such individuals must recuse themselves as having a conflict of interest and cannot possibly stand under a public oath; and [and per number iii above, they hold no office, have committed fraud and are warring against their Constitution (compact) and still have a conflict of interest and cannot serve honestly, with impartiality and fairlyâ€¦ as they have a vested interest!]
(iv) The Presumption of Immunity is that key members of the Private Bar Guild in the capacity of "public officials" acting as judges, prosecutors and magistrates who have sworn a solemn public oath in good faith are immune from personal claims of injury and liability. Unless openly challenged and their oath demanded, the presumption stands that the members of the Private Bar Guild as public trustees acting as judges, prosecutors and magistrates are immune from any personal accountability for their actions; and [Here, they are not immune, for the fraud, is the greatest importance to rebut their presumptionsâ€¦ and for tort!]
(v) The Presumption of Summons is that by custom (that) a summons un-rebutted stands and therefore one who attends Court is presumed to accept a position (defendant, juror, witness) and jurisdiction of the court. Attendance to court is usually invitation by summons. Unless the summons is rejected and returned, with a copy of the rejection filed prior to choosing to visit or attend, jurisdiction and position as the accused and the existence of "guilt" stands; and [Get the hint here as applied to the summonsâ€¦ for their profit? Here, you may want to send a letter of refusal by UCC 3-501 â€“ â€˜Refused for Cause Without Dishonorâ€™; where â€˜theyâ€™ are now required to bring forth the contract with bona fide signatures, their delegation of authority and rebut your affidavit of rebuttal!]
(vi) The Presumption of Custody is that by custom (that) a summons or warrant for arrest un-rebutted stands and therefore one who attends Court is presumed to be a â€˜thingâ€™ (the â€˜Resâ€™) and therefore liable to be detained in custody by "Custodians". Custodians may only lawfully hold custody of property and "things" not flesh and blood soul possessing beings. Unless this presumption is openly challenged by rejection of summons and/or at court, the presumption stands you are a thing and property and therefore lawfully able to be kept in custody by custodians; and [Again, where was the â€˜Full Disclosureâ€™â€¦ so you rebut by you â€˜affidavit of rebuttal of presumptionsâ€™, for cause, and consider not attending their secret society-primary commercial business courts!]
(vii) The Presumption of Court of Guardians is the presumption that as you may be listed as a "resident" of a ward of a local government area and have listed on your "passport" the letter P, you are a pauper and therefore under the "Guardian" powers of the government and its agents as a "Court of Guardians". Unless this presumption is openly challenged to demonstrate you are both a general guardian and general executor of the matter (trust) before the court, the presumption stands and you are by default a pauper, and lunatic and therefore must obey the rules of the clerk of guardians (clerk of magistrates court); [â€œResidentâ€ = Res (a thing, ident = to identify. When you state that you are a resident out of court or in court you are stating that you are the â€˜Thingâ€™ and a pauper and a lunatic! How could a Divine Being, Living Soul and flesh and blood sentient Manâ€¦ be a thing?]
(viii) The Presumption of Court of Trustees is that members of the Private Bar Guild presume you accept the office of trustee as a "public servant" and "government employee" just by attending a Roman Court, as such Courts are always for public trustees by the rules of the Guild and the Roman System. Unless this presumption is openly challenged to state you are merely visiting by "invitation" to clear up the matter and you are not a government employee or public trustee in this instance, the presumption stands and is assumed as one of the most significant reasons to claim jurisdiction - simply because you "appeared"; [And presumption here is that you can do this all by letter to the Clerk of the â€˜privateâ€™ Court with your attached â€˜Affidavit of Rebuttal of Presumptionsâ€™]
(ix) The Presumption of Government acting in two roles as Executor and Beneficiary is that for the matter at hand, the Private Bar Guild appoints the judge/magistrate in the capacity of Executor while the Prosecutor acts in the capacity of Beneficiary of the trust for the current matter. If the accused does seek to assert their right as Executor and Beneficiary over their body, mind and soul they are acting as an Executor De Son Tort or a "false executor" challenging the "rightful" judge as Executor. Therefore, the judge/magistrate assumes the role of "true" executor and has the right to have you arrested, detained, fined or forced into a psychiatric evaluation. Unless this presumption is openly challenged to demonstrate you are both the true general guardian and general executor of the matter (trust) before the court, questioning and challenging whether the judge or magistrate is seeking to act as Executor De Son Tort, the presumption stands and you are by default the trustee, therefore must obey the rules of the executor (judge/magistrate) or you are an Executor De Son Tort and a judge or magistrate of the private Bar guild may seek to assistance of bailiffs or sheriffs to assert their false claim against you; and [Rebut!!!]
(x) The Presumption of Agent and Agency is the presumption that under contract law you have expressed and granted authority to the Judge and Magistrate through the statement of such words as "recognize, understand" or "comprehend" and therefore agree to be bound to a contract. Therefore, unless all presumptions of agent appointment are rebutted through the use of such formal rejections as "I do not recognize you", to remove all implied or expressed appointment of the judge, prosecutor or clerk as agents, the presumption stands and you agree to be contractually bound to perform at the direction of the judge or magistrate; and
(xi) The Presumption of Incompetence is the presumption that you are at least ignorant of the law, therefore incompetent to present yourself and argue properly. Therefore, the judge/magistrate as executor has the right to have you arrested, detained, fined or forced into a psychiatric evaluation. Unless this presumption is openly challenged to the fact that you know your position as executor and beneficiary and actively rebuke and object to any contrary presumptions, then it stands by the time of pleading that you are incompetent then the judge or magistrate can do what they need to keep you obedient; and [And here, with over 25 Million (+/-) of their private Laws, are we not all ignorant of the law(s)? Are we not only bound to the Ten Commandments of our Creatorâ€¦ since the State did not create us!? [See Hale v. Henkle belowâ€¦ but note the use/definition of certain words, i.e.: individual is read as a man, citizen as a man (citizen equates to â€˜subjectâ€™), State as corporationâ€¦ since the court decisions come out from these â€˜for profit corporate businessesâ€™ to further confuse and entrap the reader! The â€˜peopleâ€™ are not part, parcel, property or subjects of these for-profit government corporations! WE THE PEOPLE ARE ABOVE THEM!]]
Hale v. Henkle:
"...we are of the opinion that there is a clear distinction in this particular between an individual and a corporation, and that the latter has no right to refuse to submit its books and papers for an examination at the suit of the State. The individual may stand upon his constitutional rights as a citizen. He is entitled to carry on his private business in his own way. His power to contract is unlimited. He owes no duty to the State or to his neighbors to divulge his business; or to open his doors to an investigation so far as it may tend to criminate him. He owes no such duty to the State, since he receives nothing there-from, beyond the protection of his life and property. His rights are such as existed by the law of the land long antecedent to the organization of the State, and can only be taken from him by due process of law, and in accordance with the Constitution. He owes nothing to the public so long as he does not trespass upon their rights... ...an individual may lawfully refuse to answer incriminating questions, unless protected by an immunity statute." â”€ HALE v. HENKLE, 201 U.S. 43 @ pg.74 (1903).
[ Note on the Constitution(S): The constitutions are the â€˜compactâ€™/contract that operates upon the public officer by their oath of office and they take an oath not to violate the 1st, 2nd, 4th, 5th, 10th, etc., Article in Amendment of the Bill of Rights, in their dealings WITH YOU! The private man is not a party to the constitution (compact)! IT DOES NOT OPERATE UPON YOU! ] Padelford, Fay & Co. vs. The Mayor and Alderman of the City of Savannah, 14 Ga. 438 (1854)
(xii) The Presumption of Guilt is the presumption that as it is presumed to be a private business meeting of the Bar Guild, you are guilty whether you plead "guilty", do not plead or plead "not guilty". Therefore unless you either have previously prepared an affadavit of truth and motion to dismiss with extreme prejudice onto the public record or call a demurrer, then the presumption is you are guilty and the private Bar Guild can hold you until a bond is prepared to guarantee the amount the guild wants to profit from you. [And is that not what they do? Does not the Good Book say: â€œYe shall know them by their fruitâ€. Again, whereâ€™s the full disclosure? Is the government right here or are you wrong for not retrieving this knowledge from the ethers of the Universe on your 18th Birthday? Or was there fraud involved?]
And of the Accusator:
Accusator is the formal role of a party that brings one or more accusations against another that by law demands a competent forum for hearing, resolution and compensation. The Accusator is responsible for the preparation, analysis and conducting the suit against an accused man or woman on behalf of the [private] society. Canon 3254
The word Accusator comes from the Latin accusator meaning "the one who accuses" and was the formal title given to the party who first brought the accusations of a controversy before a competent Forum. Canon 3255
Prosecutor is a 16th Century term created for Roman Courts and comes from two Latin terms being Pro Se meaning â€œfor oneâ€™s own behalfâ€ and cutis â€œskin (flesh)â€. Hence Pro-Se-Cutis literally means â€œon behalf of one's own skinâ€ or a Beneficiary De Son Tort or simply the â€œfalse beneficiaryâ€. Canon 3256 [ the â€œfalse beneficiaryâ€ seeking to create the security instrument and bond on the case/matter, with your ignorance and presumed guilt, irrespective of the truth, the facts or the law! They win, you lose! No justice, itâ€™s just business! ]
The Roman Cult and the private law guilds corrupted the role of the Accusator and replaced it with the role of the "Prosecutor" in the 16th Century to both comply with the principles of the Sacrament of Penance upon which all Roman Suits are based and secondly to comply with trust law. Under Trust law it is the beneficiary that brings the complaint to the Executor, not a Trustee or non-related party. Furthermore, by presuming the role of the accused in making the accusation, the Prosecutor perfects the "prayer of confession" consistent with the Roman Cult sacrament of Penance. Canon 3257 [Might this â€œPrayer of Confessionâ€ be the â€œPLEA BARGAIN / AGREEMENTâ€ that one confesses to the judge for a lessor judgment penaltyâ€¦ of which the judge is not bound to such Plea Bargainâ€¦ Oops, someone is going to put their neck in a noose in those situations! Robert Bork said in his Supreme Court Confirmation hearing that: â€œAll persons in prison volunteered to be there!â€ Howâ€™d they do that not being fully informed, disclosed and/or knowing what to do or say? Trickery, lies and deceptions!]
It is a primary function of the Accusator to prepare the indictment [a commercial instrument!] and establish sufficient claim of actus reus ("guilty act") and the presumption of sufficient motive to presume mens rea ("guilty mind"). In the absence of sufficient grounds for presumption on either actus reus or mens rea, an indictment is deficient.
The purpose of the role of the Prosecutor is founded on trickery and corruption of the law to usurp the position of the accused. [Fraudulent Conversion]
Once a man or woman who is accused competently asserts their position as both Executor and Beneficiary of any trust created in their legal name that claims control over their mind, flesh, soul and behavior, the Prosecutor becomes a Beneficiary De Son Tort and must immediately withdraw from the Court and the matter be dismissed with extreme prejudice. Canon 3258
Additional Editor comment:
As we have known for years, the â€˜attorneyâ€™ cannot represent you in your â€˜private capacity (Living Soul - Natural Flesh & Blood Man). They can only represent the ALL CAPITAL LETTERED, FICTITIOUS CORPORATE NAME which appears on your Birth Certificate, Driver license, SS Card or Check Book. This â€˜Entityâ€™ is the â€˜citizen/subject/slave/ward/thing/object of the Corporation(s) known as the UNITED STATES, Inc. OF AMERICA, the States, etc., which is the Corporate Interest of England. â€œBar attorneys exist to cover up the smoke screen operation on and against the peopleâ€, as Jean Keating has said.
Also, be aware of the fact that most all Courts are â€˜registeredâ€™ on Dunn & Bradstreet as â€˜for profitâ€™ corporations! Those that can check that out on the internet may do so! The other actors are NGOâ€™s, not licensed, bonded or insured with no oath of office working under a 501(c)(3) - not for profit, laundering the money through the courts. The NGOâ€™s may have similar uniforms, but can be seen, as an example, driving in vehicles that read â€˜POLICE of Boston Cityâ€™. It is the â€˜ofâ€™ that identifies the NGOâ€™s!
So do you the reader ACCEPT and ACKNOWLEDGE this information as Full Disclosure? Do see the importance of having â€˜standingâ€™ by as needed; youâ€™re Affidavit of Rebuttal and Affidavit of Status/Standing? â€¦ or are you by your silence and non-action going to be continually subjected to the private business of so-called courts where you will be raped, pillaged and plundered? Yes, itâ€™s your decision! The question isâ€¦ Do you understand?
Reference was made to â€˜Rebut their Presumptionsâ€™. You will find that in your Stateâ€™s Revised Code (secret) of Statutes, their list of Presumptionsâ€¦ (in Oregon, itâ€™s Vol. 1 â€“ Remedial Code/ORCP) at 40.135 Rule 311 and those too, if not rebutted as well, you presume to be in agreement and subject to!
Again understand, for the record these presumptions must be rebutted and if you can do this outside of the courtroom by mail, fine, but the â€˜Commercial Chargesâ€™ still have to be discharged FOR the entity as identified on the â€˜commercialâ€™ charging instrument; complain, information or indictment... as there is no lawful constitutional money in circulation in which to pay debts at law!
There is no â€˜Statutes of Limitationâ€™ for FRAUD! For lack of full disclosure of the above, you were defrauded! What did you lose from going to court last week or 25 years ago? How much did you have to pay? How much time did you spend in Jail or prison? What property was taken from you? For each day of unlawful incarceration, the monetary damages are set at $1.8 Million dollars a dayâ€¦ based on fraud, you bet! You do have a right to a remedy!
ï‚«If you would like to order the â€˜Rebuttal to the Presumptions,â€™ consisting of; Affidavit of Rebuttal, Memorandum in Support of Affidavit, Affidavit of Status/Standing and instructions, send $200.00, check or money order made out to â€˜Americanâ€™s Bulletinâ€™ and request the same, to:
The Americanâ€™s Bulletin PO Box 3096 Central Point, Oregon 97502
The Americanâ€™s Bulletin â€“ â€˜A Must Haveâ€™ Truth-Exposing Free-Press Newspaper in the Freedom Movement â€“ 24 packed pages â€“ 6 issues a year - $45.00 â€“ For those incarcerated $40.00 - - Check or Money Order only! New- Web/Digital subscription at $30 â€“ go to > americansbulletin.com !!!
*Points and reference material from Oneheaven.com